Vestnik КRAUNC. Fiz.-Mat. nauki. 2024. vol. 49. no. 4. P. 112-124. ISSN 2079-6641

INFORMATION AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES
https://doi.org/10.26117/2079-6641-2024-49-4-112-124
Research Article
Full text in Russian
MSC 65

Contents of this issue

Read Russian Version

Analysis of Geomagnetic Field Variations Based on the Results of the «Aurora» Interactive System

Y. A. Polozov^{\ast}, O. V. Mandrikova

Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Radio Wave Propagation FEB RAS, Russia, 684034, Paratunka, Mirnay St. 7

Abstract. This paper describes the geomagnetic component of the Aurora system, which assesses the state of the Earth’s magnetic field using data from the Paratunka (Kamchatka Krai, 52.97^{\circ} N, 158.24^{\circ}  E) and Khabarovsk (47.61^{\circ} N, 134.69^{\circ} E) stations. The data were obtained by direct measurements at magnetic observatories. The geomagnetic component of the Aurora system was developed at IKIR FEB RAS. The functions of this component are based on new approaches and methods developed by the team of scientists of the System Analysis Laboratory. The developed methods are based on the synthesis of elements of wavelet transform theory with methods of probability theory and mathematical statistics. The system provides a comprehensive assessment of the state of the Earth’s magnetic field in disturbed and calm periods and enables the study of spatial and temporal features and dynamics of processes in the Earth’s magnetosphere. The conclusion about the state of the magnetic field is formed in the operational mode. The analysis of the system operation during the periods of the events considered in the article confirmed the possibility of weak short-period synchronous geomagnetic disturbances preceding the onset of magnetic storms. The geomagnetic component considered in the article complements the complex analysis of geophysical monitoring data in the system. The results of the geomagnetic component of the Aurora system can be used as an additional tool in the tasks of operational space weather forecasting.

Key words: geomagnetic field, data analysis, wavelets, magnetic storms.

Received: 28.10.2024; Revised: 21.11.2024; Accepted: 25.11.2024; First online: 28.11.2024

For citation. Polozov Y. A., Mandrikova O. V. Analysis of geomagnetic field variations based on the results of the «Aurora» interactive system. Vestnik KRAUNC. Fiz.-mat. nauki. 2024, 49: 4, 112-124. EDN: IVINBR. https://doi.org/10.26117/2079-6641-2024-49-4-112-124.

Funding. The work was supported by IKIR FEB RAS State Task (subject registration No. 124012300245-2). Competing interests. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding authorship and publication.

Contribution and Responsibility. All authors contributed to this article. Authors are solely responsible for providing the final version of the article in print. The final version of the manuscript was approved by all authors.

^{\ast}Correspondence: E-mail: polozov@ikir.ru

The content is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

© Polozov Y. A., Mandrikova O. V., 2024

© Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Radio Wave Propagation, 2024 (original layout, design, compilation)

References

1. Singh A. K., et. al. Physics of Space Weather Phenomena: A Review, Geosci., 2021, vol. 11, 286. DOI: 10.3390/geosciences11070286
2. Despirak I. V., et. al. Supersubstorms during Storms of September 7–8, 2017, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2020, vol. 60, pp. 292–300 DOI: 10.1134/S0016793220030044
3. Bailey R. L., Leonhardt R. Automated Detection of Geomagnetic Storms with Heightened Risk of GIC, Earth, Planets and Space, 2016, vol. 68, p. 99 DOI: 10.1186/s40623-016-0477-2
4. Mandrikova O. V. Application of the New Wavelet–Decomposition Method for the Analysis of Geomagnetic Data and Cosmic Ray Variations, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2021, vol. 61, pp. 492–507. DOI: 10.1134/S0016793221030117
5. Mandrikova O. V., Stepanenko A. A. Automated method for calculating the Dst-index based on the wavelet model of geomagnetic field variations, Computer Optics, 2020, vol. 44, pp. 797–808. DOI: 10.18287/2412-6179-CO-709
6. Gogatishvili I.M Geomagnetic precursors of intense earthquakes in the spectrum of geomagnetic pulsations with frequencies of 1–0.02 Hz, Geomag. and Aeron., 1984, vol. 24, P. 697–700.
7. Agayan S., Bogoutdinov S., Krasnoperov R., Sidorov R. Multiscale Approach to Geomagnetic Storm Morphology Analysis Based on DMA Activity Measures, Applied Sciences, 2021, vol. 11, p. 12120. DOI: 10.3390/app112412120
8. Zelinsky N. R., Kleimenova N. G., Gromova L. I. Applying the New Method of Time-Frequency Transforms to the Analysis of the Characteristics of Geomagnetic Рс5 Pulsations. Geomag. and Aeron., 2017, vol. 57, P. 559–565. DOI: 10.1134/S0016793217050188
9. Agayan S., et. al. The Study of Time Series Using the DMA Methods and Geophysical Applications, Data Science Journal, 2016, vol. 15, 16. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2016-016
10. Rabie E., Hafez A. G., Saad O. M., El-Sayed A.–H. M., Abdelrahman K., Al–Otaibi N. Geomagnetic Micro–Pulsation Automatic Detection via Deep Leaning Approach Guided with Discrete Wavelet Transform, Journal of King Saud University — Science, 2021, vol. 33, p. 101263. DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2020.101263
11. Khomutov S. Y. Magnetic measurements at observatories of IKIR FEB RAS: from the present to the future, Vestnik KRAUNC. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki, 2022, 41, no. 3, pp. 209–224. DOI: 10.26117/2079-6641-2022-41-4-209-224 (In Russian)
12. Chiaha S. O., Ugonabo O. J., Okpala K. C. A study on the effects of solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field on geomagnetic H–component during geomagnetic storms, Inter. Jour. of Phys. Sci., 2019, vol.14, no. 5, pp. 38-44. DOI: 10.5897/IJPS2018.4772
13. Mandrikova O., Polozov Y., Khomutov S. Wavelet Model of Geomagnetic Field Variations and Its Application to Detect Short–Period Geomagnetic Anomalies, Applied Sciences, 2022, vol. 12, p. 2072. DOI: 10.3390/app12042072
14. Mallat S. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. San Diego, Academic Press, 1999, 620 p.
15. Daubechies I. Ten Lectures on Wavelets. Philadelphia, Society for Industrial and Applied
    Mathematics, 1992, 357 p.

---

Information about the authors

---

---